As far as pleasure is concerned, I agree, Aristotle would definitely think that the level of pleasure would be objective. I would also agree that many people today would say that happiness is indeed subjective, and fulfillment of a purpose, or telos, is also subjective. I think Aristotle's view of the functions of humans are actually closer to the subjective view than many would think.
Of course, his view of the good life is definitely subjective. In Aristotle's case, the good life would be attaining eudaimonia, and the usage of reason to the highest capacity is the only way to reach it. However, Aristotle recognizes the multiple functions of all humans. For example, while everyone's ability to reach eudiamonia may depend upon reason, fulfilling a function as a farmer or soldier would be different for every person, depending upon their career choice; and while Aristotle would deny their "true" happiness (considering they would not reach eduaimonia) I don't think he would deny a certain level of happiness to the hardworking farmer or the courageous soldier.
No comments:
Post a Comment